مشاهدة النسخة كاملة : أرجو المساعدة في حل لهذا السؤال المجهوول
الخبير مهاب
18-06-2007, 10:23 PM
السلام عليكم
جاني بالإختبار سؤال أكمل
وذا هو
Namasate is a greeting which ( represent- represents – represented ) by the Indians .
حلوه لإني متعقد
المهم أنا إخترت represented
الخبير مهاب
19-06-2007, 04:49 PM
مافي أي رد
والجواب
صح
ولا
خطأ
؟؟؟
نهله الصاعدي
19-06-2007, 11:41 PM
الجواب الصحيح represents لان الجمله بزمن المضارع ولان Namasate
جات مفرد كمان
والجواب الي اخترته صحيح في حالة زمن الجمله بالماضي وباستخدام was بدل is
مشاعل2007
20-01-2008, 09:38 PM
مع احترامي الشديد لنهله الجواب الصحيح هو (represented)
لانه مبني للمجهول
و القاعدة تقول is represented للمضارع , was represented للماضي
ابوعلي الغامدي
08-02-2008, 12:58 PM
مع احترامي الشديد للجميع الجواب الصحيح هو
represents كما قالت الاخت نهلة
لانه مضارع بسيط ولانه جاء بعد which ولم يسبق بـ is او was
والله اعلم.
dreamer
14-02-2008, 08:54 PM
السلام عليكم
تحية طيبة للجميع
الجملة مبنى للمجهول لذلك الجواب الصحيح هو represented
Namastee (subject) is (helping verb) represented
( main verb -v3 ) by indians.
After is the verb must be with ( ing) and this present continuous OR ( v3 past participle ) and this passive.
dreamer
14-02-2008, 08:55 PM
السلام عليكم
تحية طيبة للجميع
الجملة مبنى للمجهول لذلك الجواب الصحيح هو represented
Namasate (subject) is (helping verb) represented
( main verb -v3 ) by indians.
After is the verb must be with ( ing) and this present continuous OR ( v3 past participle ) and this passive.
اجابتك صحيحه باذن الله
لآنه مبني للمجهول
وفق الله الجميع
:36_4_12:
Abo Besal
15-02-2008, 04:32 PM
The correct answer is (represented ) because it is passive
which is a relative noun.
layla_2000ad
21-02-2008, 10:19 PM
[
Dear Mahab
Your answer is 100% correct, the mistake is the strcutre of the question dear
The rule you mentioned is called "shortening passive clauses
The original sentence is:
Namasate is a greeting which is/was represented by the Indians
If i ask you to shorten the passive clause, you would write:
Namasate is a greeting represnted by the Indians
You have to omit which is/was as the rule says
The rule
in an "identifying clause" you can delete:
THAT + 'BE' / WHICH + 'BE'
that is/ was/are
which is/was/were
In your case, "which" was left and the helping verb was omitted!! Such confusion is understandable dear and most probably you followed your sense of listening to evaluate your answer
Congratulations]
alraad3
21-02-2008, 10:27 PM
Layla 2000:
Thank you for the correct explanation of the wrong question> i was about to explain it in the same way, but yoy did it> thank you, again. you have an excellent knowledge of english grammar
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved, TranZ by Almuhajir