رد مع اقتباسthank you
well done
appreciated
A-movement argument-movement, the syntactically motivated movement of arguments from argument positions to argument positions. The Case-motivated movement of DPs in
passive and
raising structures is a typical example for this movement type. SEEM \APPEAR\HAPPEN
A'-movement A-bar movement, non-argument movement, the movement of
arguments or non-arguments to non-argument positions, e.g.
wh-movement or focus fronting.
adjacency
according to traditional analyses Case assigner and Case assignee must be adjacent, next to each other. This accounts for why the sentence
*Mary speaks fluently English is ungrammatical.
adjunct
a constituent not selected by a head.
anaphor
a reflexive (e.g. himself) or
a reciprocal (e.g. each other).
A DP without independent reference needing an antecedent.
anaphoric operator an operator that behaves like an anaphor, one that is referentially dependent on another constituent in the sentence, like
a wh-element in relative clauses.
antecedent a constituent another constituent without independent reference (such as an anaphor or a trace) takes reference from/is coreferential with. In the sentence
‘Mary is enjoying herself’ the antecedent of herself is Mary. We indicate coreference with coindexation.
arbitrary reference in certain contexts PRO does not need an antecedent, it has a generic interpretation similarly to the pronoun
one:
[CP PRO to be] or [CP PRO not to be], that is the question
binary features abstract representations of a contrasting linguistic unit such as [±Tense]. These units can have one of the two values + or –.
binder
a nominal expression that gives reference to another nominal expression without independent reference. In the sentence
Mary knows that she will pass the exam
the constituent Mary can be the binder of the pronoun she (mind you, it is not necessarily so, the interpretation of the pronoun can be some other female character determined by the context)
binding
an element that can be coreferential with another element (the most typically
pronouns and anaphors)
is bound by that element. This relationship is called binding. In the sentence Peter and Mary love each other the constituent
Peter and Mary binds each other.
binding principles principles that refer to the interpretation of nominal expressions:
a) An anaphor must have a binder within the binding domain
b) A pronominal cannot have a binder within the binding domain
c) An R-expression must be free everywhere
canonical subject position the specifier position of the IP. This is the position where subjects are assigned Case. The canonical subject position, however, is not equivalent with the base position of the subject, as was assumed for a long time, see the VP-Internal Subject Hypothesis.
a predicate.
coindexation
an indication of coreference between two constituents by giving them the same subscript index symbol. In
Peteri knows that Mary likes himi the i index indicates that in the sentence him is to be understood as referring to Peter, though in theory it could also be understood as referring to a third party previously mentioned.
comment
it forms a full sentence together with a topic. The comment is the
new information in the information structure of the sentence.
thank you
well done
appreciated
.
thank you for this topic
جزاك الله الف خير
بارك الله فيك
موقع كتير مفيد
تسلم دياك يارب
الله لا يحرمنا من جديدك الرائع
شكرا بحجم السماء
be fine my sister
accept my passing by
great thanks
الحمد لله والصلاة والسلام على أشرف الخلق محمد وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين
ضوابط المشاركة
المفضلات